Sunday, May 4, 2008

Canadian Human Rights Commission EXPOSED- Racist Oline Comments;White Supremist Sites and Identitiy Theft

Canadian Human Rights Commission EXPOSED- Racist Oline Comments;White Supremist Sites and Identitiy Theft

by Ezra Levant


http://canadianpress.google.com/articl
e/ALeqM5g5KHS-GY8SwE2zotqPSY_cO6tW-Q

CHRC:
"nothing untoward, nothing wrong" with hacking citizen's Internet

By Ezra Levant on April 27, 2008 1:51 PM | Permalink | Comments (16) | Trackback
Nelly Hechme is the innocent bystander whose Internet connection was hacked by the Canadian Human Rights Commission, so their investigators could cover their tracks when they went online under their secret codenames to surf white supremacist websites.
(I know. That entire sentence is insane. But it's true.)
Hechme has now done another interview with the Canadian Press, and the story is even worse than previously reported. According to Hechme, her Internet connection was secure -- it was actively hacked by the CHRC. Here are some other excerpts from her interview:
"It's horrible," Hechme said. "You never want something like that attached to your name."
...Hechme, 26, who lives close to the commission's offices in Ottawa, said she was "completely shocked" when a reporter contacted her about the disclosure.
"It was like the "Twilight Zone." I didn't know what the heck was going on," said Hechme, an administrative assistant with Bell Canada.
"I don't like the fact that my information was just put out all over, including my age, where I live, pictures of where I live. It's very disturbing."
So far, the commission has not explained why or how its investigators might have commandeered Hechme's connection or offered any alternative explanation for how Hechme and "Jadewarr" became linked.
That's a lot calmer than I'd be if I had my Internet connection hijacked by rogue operatives of a government bureaucracy. But the best part of the interview isn't Hechme's information. It's Ian Fine's stunning statement that they did nothing wrong.
Ian Fine, senior general counsel with the rights commission, said he was unable to comment on the specifics of the case in light of ongoing investigations but denied any wrongdoing.
"We are quite confident that, at the end of the day, it will be established that the Canadian Human Rights Commission has done nothing untoward, nothing wrong, in this whole scenario," Fine said.
Is there anything that's out of bounds over there? More to the point, is there anyone over there who will take responsibility? What about Jennifer Lynch, the chief commissioner? Does she share Fine's view that there's nothing wrong with illegally hacking a private citizen's Internet account? Of how about Rob Nicholson, the Justice Minister? Is there some special exemption from the Criminal Code for his "human rights" vigilantes? Just how bad does it have to get before he utters a word besides "no comment"?
Hechme, meanwhile, is pondering civil action, saying it's not fair she's been caught up in the murky web.
She's particularly distressed at finding her name associated with white supremacists and wonders whether that link - now firmly forged through the reach of the Internet - might come back to haunt her.
"This is the part that bothers me the most. I don't know if my name is going to be flagged if I want to cross the border, if I apply for a job," she said.
"I don't even want anyone questioning my name. Ever."
Good idea. I think Hechme should sue for an enormous sum -- I think the CHRC would pay just about anything to avoid having to reveal the truth about their vigilante activities in a real court, with real rules of disclosure -- not a human rights tribunal that's in the CHRC's pocket.
And besides grotesque revelations about the Hechme case, how many other private citizens have had their Internet accounts hacked? What else would come out if the CHRC was ever held to normal standards of accountability?
Sue, Nelly, sue!
h/t Dave P


"Criminal complaint filed against Canadian "Human Rights" Commission: Many CHRC employees Stealing nearby WiFi signals in order to spy on Canadians and to post racist messages on websites under others' identities
(note:Pseudonyms used by the CHRC on the Internet
“Jadewarr” “Jade Warrior” “Oldens Revenge” “OdensRevenge”
“jadewarr@yahoo.ca” “oldensrevenge@gmail.com”
“jadewarr@execulink.net” )


WWW.AARONJAMESSTORY.COM

The image “http://aaronjamesstory.com/IMAGES/NWAProfilingAttackBanner.JPG” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.
THAT THE RACIST BIGOTTED CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION ABANDONED US WITHIN OUT PLIGHT SHOULD COME AS NO SURPRISE GIVEN THIS WEP PAGE EXPOSE:


Canadian Human Rights

Negligence in Abandoning Our Family Without Even Reading About our Case
http://canadianhumanrightsrefuse.blogspot.com/
Canadian Human Rights CORRUPTION OVERTLY EXPOSED HEREIN: A REFUSAL LETTER SENT ON THE SAME DAY AS THE DELIBERATION WAS TO TAKE PLACE!: Candace-Crystal Rock 1-888-643 3304 or 613 947 7279 and Nicole Ritchot Regional Director(http://canadianhumanrightsrefuse.blogspot.com/ ):

***>>>CLICK ON THE SCAN INS BELOW TO FULL ENLARGE THEM FOR PUBLIC VIEWING
CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS NEGLIGENCE AND ABANDONMENT OF OUR PLIGHT:





Of these two individuals I can say only that their dismissiveness and dishonesty precedes them and is EXPOSED HEREIN: Candice-Crystal Rock Intake Officer: “The difficulties that you have encountered appear to fall under American jurisdiction. Consequently, I would have suggested you contact the Minnesota Department of Human rights; however, I see that you have already done so (she had the MN Dept Human rights refusal letter to inform her of this). Your materials are returned with this letter.” (http://canadianhumanrightsrefuse.blogspot.com )

*NOTE THAT THE PRECEEDING REFUSAL LETTER is dated JUNE 28TH- YET UNBENOWNST TO Candace, I HAD JUST RECEIVED A LETTER OF CONSIDERATION IN THE MAIL FROM NICOLE RITCHOT THAT MORNING dated JULY 10 :
July 10th: Letter Received from Nicole Ritchot “Further to our various conversations the latest of which were on JUNE 28/06, …I wish to confirm that we are seeking a legal opinion respecting whether or not a complaint filed against Northwest…would fall within the jurisdiction of the Canadian Human Rights Act.” YET SEE THE ABOVE REFUSAL- THE REFUSAL LETTER RECEIVED BY MAIL IS DATED JUNE 28TH- THE VERY DATE OF THE CONVERSATION THAT WAS STILL TO BE DELIBERATED ON AND 12 FULL DAYS BEFORE A LETTER WAS RECEIVED BY HER COUNTERPART STATING THEY WERE STILL DELIBERATING ON IT !!!
CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS CORRUPTION THUSLY EXPOSED.

“Policing is first and foremost a service to the public; the more it is at odds with the composition and values of that public, the less well it works” excerpt: Max Yalden, Chief Commissioner of the Canadian Human Rights Commission